
It's no secret that the Washington Post is known for its liberal bias. If you didn't already know that, you might also be interested in learning that the earth is indeed round.
But I came across a recent Washington Post article that piqued my interest, given my recent coverage of the apparent media bias against the SAT. The Post allowed the infamous FairTest, which I've written extensively about on Truth or Scare, to write a guest post claiming that the ACT has "caught up" to the SAT.
So, did this mean that the Washington Post shared in the anti-SAT bias I've been noticing in the media? Possibly. I left a comment on that article letting readers know exactly who FairTest is and what they're all about.
A follow-up post on Wednesday, however, left no doubt in my mind that the Post, as well as their education blogger Valerie Strauss, are definitely in the tank against the SAT.
The new post, titled, "College Board vs. FairTest" allowed the College Board to defend the SAT against the attacks put forth by FairTest in the original post. Fair enough, right?
Wrong, because in that same post, they allowed FairTest to once again attack the College Board and the SAT and gave them the final word. They could have had the decency to at least let the College Board's words sit for a bit before publishing another attack.

The Post not only published the erroneous propaganda of a political organization that seeks to destroy education standards, but they give this same radical political organization another chance to beat up on the SAT when all the College Board ever asked for was equal time.
This is perhaps the most egregious example of bias seen so far when it comes to standardized testing. It's time the Post and Valerie Strauss stop pretending to be objective and just admit their biases so readers don't confuse them with responsible journalism. Just like their political allies at FairTest, they ply their trade through deception and abuse of their positions to advance a left-wing agenda that seeks to dumb-down educational standards in pursuit of their goals.
Birds of a feather...



1 comments:
You're right about media bias. My view is that the College Board should stick to testing, but get out of the money-making business. It should stick to the knitting.
There are inherent conflicts with its stated mission when it puts itself in the lead generation business--selling student information to schools for a profit. It's now rolling out a Net Price Calculator that is being sold to schools and will generate more leads to sell and more visits to its web site. It sells test-prep materials. It sells an admissions advising service.
Surely there were a few raised eyebrows this week when it announced its contest with MTV. Are they going to give away the winning digital financial aid tool or will it be sold to schools and posted on the College Board's web site?
Finaidexpert
Post a Comment